Quantcast
Channel: Noah Parrell
Viewing all 664 articles
Browse latest View live

In the dunes

$
0
0
This area is always a special treat because you never know what might happen next ...





Marcus and Evan, by Ron Amato


Michael Joseph, by Ron Amato






Michael Joseph, by Ron Amato







Marcus and Evan, by Ron Amato

Marcus and Evan, by Ron Amato



Joie de vivre at Sandy Hook's nudist beach

$
0
0
I was neglectful this summer. I didn't visit Gunnison Beach, the nudist beach on Sandy Hook in New Jersey, until the final weekend in September. It was a treat even so.

The weather was superb. The temperature was neither too hot nor too cool. The sky was free of clouds and haze. To the north, the Verrazano-Narrows suspension bridge was distinct, so vivid that the main cables were distinguishable. The landmarks of New York City, including the Empire State Building, were equally visible. One rarely sees such clarity in the summer because of the faint haze produced by the heat island of New York City. It was a day of delicate breezes, warm water and fluctuating currents that reshaped the sand bars as the hours passed.


But of course the best part of the day was guy-watching. Gay or straight, they were a delight. And there were plenty to look at. They knew they had a great beach day when they saw one. They came from all parts of New Jersey. They came from New York City, some by car and some by ferry. I saw a couple of Connecticut license plates and of course, there was mine from Pennsylvania. I spoke with one gentleman from Wilmington, Delaware while the ocean rolled over a sandbar to soak our legs. It's fair to say that upwards of 90 percent of the guys in the gay section were nude. There were all sorts of men, from their early 20s to those with more years on them. Heavens! I don't know why I had put off a visit for so long!

These photos give you a hint of what a wonderful place Gunnison Beach is. The images were extracted from a number of blogs. A few of the photos were identified by name as having been taken at the beach. It takes a little detective work to identify the others. The key is the images in the background. If a photo clearly shows landmarks from the New York City skyline, it certainly originated at Sandy Hook. 

Many of the images come from a single photographer, which is why the subject so often is heading toward the right.

As you can see, walking is a major pastime at Gunnison. The clothing-optional area is more than a mile long, starting with the male-female section closest to the entrance and extending south to the clothes-only section for fishing. Some individuals or pairs walk for the exercise, some dip in and out of the water, some search for shells, some are people-watchers.

The photos have been accumulating in my folder over the months in anticipation of posting them as a group. As with my visit, I never got around to publishing them during the summer. But here they are, belated but enjoyable.





































Off-the-road bicyclists

Sunbathers

$
0
0
Estefano









Wiesel70






Joshua Tree National Park, California, in May 2014; by Bonnie Blue Britt



Caution: Men at Work

$
0
0
Jeremy Rowback, by Eddie Christie in May 2011

Jeremy Rowback, by Eddie Christie in May 2011


















Squeaky clean

$
0
0


Paul in Madrid, 2014, by Jean Baptiste Huong

Daniel Rumfelt, by Ray John Pila

Photo by Paul Specht

Photo by J. Toastra







Down by the old mill

$
0
0
All photos are self-portraits by DirtroadRussell













Solitary on the seaboard

$
0
0


Milton Saint Malo, self-portrait

Milton Saint Milo, self-portrait




Luces de Bengala, self-portrait

Luces de Bengala, self-portrait



Roof Gem, self-portrait





Rock of ages

$
0
0
As long as I live, I'll hear waterfalls and birds and winds sing. I'll interpret the rocks, learn the language of flood, storm and the avalanche. I'll acquaint myself with the glaciers and wild gardens, and get as near the heart of the world as I can.
—John Muir, naturalist


Burkhart Trail, Angeles National Forest, California



Ian, by Paul Paulscha












Photo by Michael Bidner

 







U.S. Supreme Court allows same-sex marriages to proceed

$
0
0
The day may finally be here.

The United States Supreme Court this morning chose to allow same-sex marriages to proceed in five states.

Without comment, the justices let stand lower court rulings that allowed couples in five states to be married. Those cases had been on appeal, and it was widely expected that the Supreme Court would examine the constitutionality of those cases later this year.

Instead the court chose not to take that step. It gave no explanation for that decision. In effect, the justices said that whatever the appeals courts said about marriage equality is fine by them.

Couples in Virginia, Oklahoma and Utah can get married immediately. Indiana and Wisconsin will join them, possibly later today, once the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals lifts its stay. The appeals court had put a hold on the marriages until the Supreme Court could act. That stay will now be lifted. (In anticipation, some county clerks this afternoon already began issuing marriage applications.)

Within a few weeks, appeals courts in another six states—Colorado, Kansas, North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming—probably will extend marriage equality based on their previous rulings in the cases that the Supreme Court chose not to hear. If that happens, same-sex marriages will be legal in 30 states and the District of Columbia.

Four other appeals court (the Fifth, Sixth, Ninth and Eleventh) are considering the constitutionality of same-sex marriage. The Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco, almost certainly will allow marriage equality. That will bring Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana and Nevada into the fold.

Most of the remaining states are in the South and upper Plains states. The Fifth Circuit currently is reviewing a case in Texas and is getting one from Louisiana. The Sixth Circuit is looking at marriage laws in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. The Eleventh Circuit has a case in Florida. 

The Eighth Circuit, covering states along the Mississippi River corridor from North Dakota to Arkansas, has yet to receive an appeal.

Today's events do not necessarily mean that same-sex marriage will become legal in all states. Nor do they mean that this is the final word from the Supreme Court. If any one of those remaining appeals courts bucks the trend, then the Supreme Court may have no alternative but to take up the issue.

And keep in mind: Four of the nine justices on the Supreme Court filed strong dissents in the Windsor case, the one that invalidated the federal Defense of Marriage Act last year and set in motion this trend among the courts in favor of marriage equality. If one of the liberal justices were to be replaced by a conservative, and a new appeal came before the court, the entire picture could change abruptly.

In short, today brought an incredibly big step in favor of marriage equality. But it may not be the final word.


Note: The Freedom to Marry blog has been keeping a minute-by-minute account of today’s developments.

Expressions of love

$
0
0
 

Andrew and Raoni in Berlin, 2014, photo by Jean Baptiste Huong






Paul Lockhard in "Truth"











Photo by Ron Amato



Anti-marriage laws scuttled in Idaho and Nevada

$
0
0
I had just sat down to write a second posting on the Supreme Court's action—or non-action, if you prefer—on same-sex marriage when this appeared on my screen:

A federal appeals court declared gay marriage legal in Idaho and Nevada on Tuesday, a day after the U.S. Supreme Court effectively legalized same-sex marriage in 30 other state 

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco struck down the two states' bans on gay marriage, ruling they violated equal protection rights.

Wow!

When same-sex couples in Idaho and Nevada awaken this morning, they can head to their courthouses to apply for marriage licenses.

I'm sure the Ninth Circuit was ready to issue it ruling without waiting for the Supreme Court's guidance. The circuit, which is one of the most liberal in the country, was widely expected to strike down the Idaho and Nevada laws.

The judges' decision in the Nevada case was a snap. Nevada's governor and attorney general chose not to defend the state law. An anti-gay group limped into the appeals court hoping to keep the state's ban alive. They failed.

Idaho officials were determined to enforce their ban. But they trotted out the usual tired arguments: that marriage was meant to be between one man and one woman, that this has always been the tradition, that it is the only way to promote the welfare of children, that this isn't a matter of sexual orientation but rather a matter of the procreation of the species.

The three judges on the Ninth Circuit were not impressed. No federal court, except for one district judge in Louisiana, has bought into that argument. The Ninth Circuit cited expert testimony to rebut Idaho's claims. The court said the state's line of reasoning was merely an excuse to deny same-sex couples the right to their constitutional right to equal protection under the law. 

In a separate concurring opinion, Judge Stephen Reinhardt went one step further: He tied these cases to the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 ruling that invalidated marriage between people of different races. Loving mandated that an individual had the right to choose his or her marriage partner, and Reihardt concluded that also meant a partner of the same sex.

In her concurring opinion, Judge Marsha S. Berzon said the Idaho and Nevada laws were unconstitutional for another reason: They discriminate unconstitutionally against people purely because of gender. 

For now the Ninth Circuit's decision applies only to Idaho and Nevada. Because the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit is wider, anti-marriage-equality laws in Alaska, Arizona and Montana can now be overturned. It is unclear how quickly that will happen. California and the other three remaining states in the circuit already allow same-sex marriage.

All three judges were appointed by Democratic presidents: Reinhardt, by President Carter, and Berzon and Ronald Gould, by President Clinton.

Same-sex marriage: the lay of the land

$
0
0
Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia now recognize same-sex marriage as legal. Idaho and Nevada were the latest additions, having lost their attempts on Tuesday to keep marriage between one man and one woman.

Put another way, more than 60 percent of American people live in states where same-sex marriages can be performed. With the exception of Florida and Texas, most gay and lesbian couples live in states with relatively high concentrations of gay or lesbian residents.

Within weeks, another three states—Alaska, Arizona and Montana—will join the fold. That would leave 35 states permitting same-sex marriage. These are states that fall within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which invalidated Idaho and Nevada's laws against marriage equality.

A 36th state soon may join the crowd. Last Friday, a federal district judge invalidated Missouri's requirement that marriages be limited to one man and one woman. Though the case is headed to an appeal, state Attorney General Chris Koster said the state will begin respecting the marriages of same-sex couples.

However, a few state are joining the bandwagon kicking and screaming. South Carolina, the state that celebrates nullification and state's rights, vows to uphold its constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals said same-sex marriage is wrong, and on Monday the United States Supreme Court chose not to question that decision. South Carolina should have fallen in line with the 4th Circuit's decision. Instead its obstructionism will lead either to litigation or yet another embarrassment for the state.


Easy riders

Nude rock climbers

$
0
0



Angeles National Forest, California

Angeles National Forest, California


Photo by Naked Mark


Sunny days. Why not be nude?

$
0
0









Black's Beach, California

Sifnos, Greece







San Gregorio Beach, northern California










Another brick in the wall

$
0
0

Photo by Kommaberlin




Photo by Kommaberlin


Under the forest canopy

$
0
0


Photo by Alwaysnovice

Photo by Abajapa




Benjamin Ackermann



Photo by Dirtroad






Raoni, by Manuel Moncayo, September 23, 2014

Photo by Gary Larson, June 2014


Raoni, by Manuel Moncayo, 2014


May all your weeds be wildflowers

$
0
0


Photo by Mike Enders
Photo by Mike Enders

"Grassroots," by Thomas Carlyle




Naked rebels

$
0
0
Protest over high unemployment in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on February 21, 2009

Protest in Veracruz, Mexico, for higher government aid to farmers

Protest over the widening of old-growth trees in Richardsons Grove, California, in 2010

Protest for open nudity in San Francisco





Protest for open nudity in San Francisco

Protest for open nudity in San Francisco


Viewing all 664 articles
Browse latest View live